Record · Classical world · Europe · 487 BC · Culture & ideas

Why Did Athens Choose Its Leaders by Lottery, Not Election?

Published · Reviewed · 6 min read

bronze allotment plates with punched names
Bronze pinakia, the citizen name-plates fed into the allotment machine, 5th to 2nd century BC. Ancient Agora Museum, Athens. Zde / CC BY-SA 4.0. Source

TL;DR — Ancient Athens filled most public offices, from the Council of 500 to its juries, by lottery, drawing lots with a slotted marble machine called the kleroterion. Aristotle called the lot the democratic way to fill an office and election the oligarchic way. That “every citizen” meant only free adult men.

Athens, from the reforms of Cleisthenes in 508/507 BC, filled the Council of 500, most magistracies and its juries by drawing lots rather than by election. Only a few specialist posts, above all the generals, were still elected. The draw was made in public with a slotted marble machine, the kleroterion, so that no one could buy or campaign for a seat. The citizen body that took part was free adult men only.

How did ancient Athens choose its leaders?

For most public positions, by lottery, a practice called sortition. The Council of 500 (the boule), the great majority of magistracies, and juries of hundreds of citizens were all filled by drawing lots. A handful of posts were still elected by show of hands: the Constitution of the Athenians attributed to Aristotle lists all the military officers, along with the treasurer of military funds, the controllers of the spectacle fund and the superintendent of wells. The default method of staffing the Athenian state was chance.

This was direct democracy, not the representative kind of modern states. Citizens did not elect people to govern on their behalf; they governed themselves, and took turns running the machinery of the city.

What was the kleroterion?

The kleroterion was a slotted marble slab that worked as a randomizing machine. The Constitution of the Athenians describes the jury draw: each juror’s ticket (pinakion), with his name, his father’s name and his deme, was fixed in a row of the frame; then the archon threw in copper dice, black and white, one white for every five tickets, and as each die came out the herald called the row it fell to. Even the attendant who fixed the tickets was chosen by lot, “in order that the same person may not always affix the tickets and cheat.” The draw was made in the open, in front of everyone watching.

The hardware survives. The Agora excavators found a Pentelic marble kleroterion with eleven rows of slots in 1935, reused as a floor slab near the Metroon, with traces of holes at the left side for the lottery tube.

rows of small bronze identification plates inscribed with names in a museum display
Bronze pinakia, citizen ID plates used with the kleroterion, 5th-2nd century BC, Ancient Agora Museum, Athens. Zde / CC BY-SA 4.0. Source

Why not just hold elections?

Because Greek writers treated election as the method of the few. Aristotle wrote in the Politics that “it is thought to be democratic for the offices to be assigned by lot, for them to be elected oligarchic.” Herodotus put the same idea in the mouth of the Persian Otanes: rule by the multitude “determines offices by lot, and holds power accountable, and conducts all deliberating publicly.”

If a few great families captured every seat, Athens risked sliding straight back into the rule of the few it had thrown off not long before. The lottery was, in part, an anti-oligarchy device: no one could buy or campaign his way to a seat decided by chance.

How did direct democracy work day to day?

Adult male citizens gathered for the assembly (the ekklesia), which met four times in each of the ten prytanies of the year, about forty meetings, to decide war, finance, and public policy. The Council of 500, fifty men from each of the ten tribes and itself chosen by lot, met every day except holidays and posted the agenda. Courts were run by juries of citizens over 30, chosen by lot from those who presented their tickets; the Constitution of the Athenians requires jurors to be over thirty and free of debt to the treasury.

The effect was that an ordinary potter or farmer, when his turn came up, might spend a year helping run the state. Governing was a duty that rotated through the citizen body, not the work of a separate professional class.

Who reorganized Athens to make this possible?

The reforms of Cleisthenes, around 508/507 BC, put Athenian government on a democratic footing. He registered citizens by their local deme, so that men were named by deme rather than by father, and replaced the old four tribes with ten new ones, each assigned by lot one third from the city, one from the coast and one from the inland district, “wishing to mix them up, in order that more might take part in the government.” He enlarged the Council from 400 to 500, fifty from each tribe. Solon’s earlier reforms had laid groundwork by canceling debts and prohibiting loans secured on the person.

Was Athenian democracy democracy for all?

Only free adult male citizens could draw those lots or raise their hands in the assembly. Women, enslaved people, and foreign residents (metics) were all excluded. In their “equality for all,” the “all” was still narrow. The lottery spread power evenly, but only across the free adult men who held a citizen’s token.

Key facts

  • Athens filled most offices by lottery (sortition), using the kleroterion.
  • The Council of 500 (boule) had 50 men from each of the ten tribes.
  • The assembly (ekklesia) met four times in each prytany, about 40 times a year.
  • Elected posts were the exception: the military officers and three financial posts, chosen by show of hands.
  • Cleisthenes’ reforms (~508/507 BC) created the democratic framework.
  • Only free adult male citizens could take part; women, the enslaved, and foreigners were excluded.

FAQ

Did Athens really pick leaders by lottery?

Yes. Most public offices, including the Council of 500, most magistracies, and the juries, were filled by drawing lots. Only a few roles, above all the military officers, were elected by show of hands.

What is sortition?

Sortition is selecting officeholders by random lot rather than by election. Athens is the most famous historical example, using the kleroterion machine to make the draw fair and public.

Why did Athens prefer lottery over voting?

Aristotle wrote that the lot was thought democratic and election oligarchic, and Herodotus's Otanes named the lot, accountability and public debate as the marks of rule by the multitude. A lottery gave every eligible citizen an equal chance and guarded against a return to oligarchy.

Was ancient Athenian democracy the same as modern democracy?

No. It was direct: citizens governed in person rather than electing representatives. It was also limited to free adult male citizens, excluding women, the enslaved, and foreigners.

Who could vote in Athens?

Only free adult male citizens. That excluded women, enslaved people, and resident foreigners (metics).

Sources

Cite this article

APA
Song Letter. (2026, October 11). Why Did Athens Choose Its Leaders by Lottery, Not Election? Our Earth's History. https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-sortition-lottery-democracy/
Chicago
Song Letter. “Why Did Athens Choose Its Leaders by Lottery, Not Election?” Our Earth's History, October 11, 2026. https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-sortition-lottery-democracy/.
MLA
Song Letter. “Why Did Athens Choose Its Leaders by Lottery, Not Election?” Our Earth's History, 11 Oct. 2026, https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-sortition-lottery-democracy/.

Get the week in history

One email a week: the new articles, and what was happening elsewhere at the same moment. Free, no ads, unsubscribe any time. How we handle your email.

Text licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Found an error? Tell us.