Record · Classical world · Europe · 487 BC · Culture & ideas

Why Did Athens Vote to Exile Its Most Powerful Men — on Broken Pottery?

Published · Reviewed · 6 min read

potsherds scratched with the name Themistocles
Ostraka inscribed with the name of Themistocles. Ancient Agora Museum, Athens. Sharon Mollerus / CC BY 2.0. Source

TL;DR — In ancient Athens, citizens could vote once a year to exile a man whose power was growing dangerously large. The ballot was a shard of broken pottery (an ostracon), scratched with the name of the man judged most dangerous. If at least six thousand shards were cast, the man named most often had to leave Athens for ten years. This was ostracism, a check to stop anyone from becoming a tyrant again, and no punishment for any crime. The exiled man kept his property and honor, and could return after his ten years.

Ancient Athens let its citizens vote once a year to send one man into exile for ten years, his name scratched on a shard of pottery. The procedure was called ostracism, after the ostracon, the pottery shard used as a ballot. Plutarch says the vote was void unless six thousand shards were cast; the man named most often went away, but he was convicted of nothing, kept the income from his property and could return when the ten years were up. The Athenians built the practice as a guard against a second tyrant, inside the democracy that followed Cleisthenes’ reforms of 508/507 BC.

Why would Athens exile someone for being too powerful?

Athens had a memory it did not want to repeat. Before its democracy, the city had once been held by a single man, a tyrant, meaning someone who seized power by force rather than by the citizens’ choice.

The Athenians drove that ruler out and began governing themselves, with no king and no tyrant. One fear lingered: that another man might grow powerful enough to take the city all over again. Ostracism was their answer to that fear.

How did the vote work?

Each year, in the sixth prytany of the council’s calendar, the citizens’ assembly voted on whether to hold an ostracism at all, according to the Constitution of the Athenians attributed to Aristotle. If it decided yes, a day was set and the citizens gathered in the agora, in a space fenced with railings.

The ballot was a shard of broken pottery, an ostracon. Onto it each citizen scratched the name of the one man he wished to remove from the city, and the archons gathered and counted the shards. Thousands survive. The American School of Classical Studies at Athens reports that about 1,200 had been found in the Agora by the early 1980s, among them a cup foot found on April 26, 1947, incised with the name of Themistocles, son of Neocles, of the deme Phrearrhioi. A review in the Bryn Mawr Classical Review counts about 8,500 more found in the Kerameikos between 1966 and 1969.

broken pottery fragments inscribed with names, displayed in a museum case
Ostraka, pottery shards inscribed with a name for the ostracism vote, Museum of Cycladic Art, Athens. Gary Todd from Xinzheng, China / CC0. Source

What happened to the man with the most votes?

In Plutarch’s outline of the procedure, the archons first counted the total; if fewer than six thousand shards had been cast, the ostracism was void. Then they sorted the names, and the man with the most was proclaimed banished for ten years. The six-thousand figure rests on Plutarch, writing some five centuries later, and the exact date the practice began is also uncertain.

The procedure, sending a man out of the city by names carved on broken pottery, was called ostracism (ostrakismos), the root of the English word “ostracize.”

Was ostracism a punishment?

No. Ostracism was not a penalty for any crime. Plutarch wrote that it was “not a chastisement of base practices” but a “humbling and docking of oppressive prestige and power.” The exiled man was not convicted of anything; he kept the income from his property, and he could simply return once his ten years were up.

It was a check on power. Aristotle, in the Politics, wrote that democracies used ostracism against men “thought to be outstandingly powerful on account of wealth or popularity or some other form of political strength,” banishing them for fixed periods.

The common framing, that a man who got too popular was thrown out, is a little misleading. Ostracism was aimed at power gathering in one man’s hands, the very thing that could produce a new tyrant. Mere celebrity or likeability was not the target. The Athenians were guarding a system.

Where did ostracism fit in Athenian democracy?

Ostracism belongs to the democratic system that developed after Cleisthenes’ reforms around 508/507 BC, which reorganized Athenian citizens and put the city on a democratic footing. Ostracism grew up within that framework as a safeguard.

Its precise origins are debated. The Constitution of the Athenians credits the law to Cleisthenes but says it was first put in force two years after Marathon, against Hipparchus, a kinsman of the old tyrants; Megacles, Xanthippus and Aristides followed in the 480s BC, and all the exiles were recalled when Xerxes invaded. The last ostracism, Plutarch says, was Hyperbolus’s, about 417 BC, after which the Athenians dropped the practice. The law also hardened after the recall: ostracized men were thereafter forbidden to live within a line drawn from Geraestus to Scyllaeum, under pain of losing their citizenship.

Key facts

  • Ostracism let Athenian citizens vote once a year to exile a man whose power grew dangerous.
  • The ballot was a shard of broken pottery, an ostracon, scratched with a name.
  • If at least six thousand shards were cast, the man named most often went into exile for ten years (Plutarch).
  • It was a check against tyranny, not a punishment: the exiled kept property and honor and could return.
  • It developed within the democratic system that followed Cleisthenes’ reforms (c. 508/507 BC).
  • The Constitution of the Athenians dates the first ostracism to two years after Marathon; the last, of Hyperbolus, fell about 417 BC.

FAQ

What was ostracism in ancient Athens?

Ostracism was an annual procedure by which Athenian citizens could vote to exile, for ten years, any man whose power was seen as dangerously large, by writing his name on a shard of pottery.

What is an ostracon?

An ostracon is a shard of broken pottery. In Athens, citizens used ostraca as ballots, scratching onto them the name of the man they wished to see exiled.

Was ostracism a criminal punishment?

No. It was not a penalty for a crime. The exiled man kept his property and honor and could return to Athens after ten years; it was a check on concentrated power.

How many votes led to exile?

Plutarch says the archons first checked that at least six thousand shards had been cast; if so, the man with the most votes was banished. The figure rests on Plutarch alone.

When did ostracism begin?

It developed within the democratic system set up by Cleisthenes around 508/507 BC. The Constitution of the Athenians credits him with the law but dates its first use to two years after Marathon, so the exact start is debated.

Sources

Cite this article

APA
Song Letter. (2026, October 11). Why Did Athens Vote to Exile Its Most Powerful Men — on Broken Pottery? Our Earth's History. https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-ostracism-broken-pottery-exile/
Chicago
Song Letter. “Why Did Athens Vote to Exile Its Most Powerful Men — on Broken Pottery?” Our Earth's History, October 11, 2026. https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-ostracism-broken-pottery-exile/.
MLA
Song Letter. “Why Did Athens Vote to Exile Its Most Powerful Men — on Broken Pottery?” Our Earth's History, 11 Oct. 2026, https://ourearthshistory.com/europe/classical/athens-ostracism-broken-pottery-exile/.

Get the week in history

One email a week: the new articles, and what was happening elsewhere at the same moment. Free, no ads, unsubscribe any time. How we handle your email.

Text licensed CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Found an error? Tell us.